Archive for February, 2009

A history of presidential campaign graphics before they got Obamafied

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

Shepard Fairey for Obama

I remember the first time I really saw the Obama campaign graphics out in the wild, at a rally in Hollywood on January 31, 2008. It was just before the Democratic debates at the Kodak Theater and, as you can see, just after the first Shepard Fairey images had started to appear in official posters. I remember coming home and telling my friend: “Dude, if people actually cared about design, Hillary is totally gonna lose.”

obama-open-images001

As Obama’s momentum grew and I realized people might actually care about design (or design might make people care about him), I started getting really curious about how campaigns had been designed in the past. I’d always been fascinated by the beautiful old campaign buttons, which I guess was kind of like updating your Facebook status back in the day. But even though they’re fascinating, you can see there’s not a whole lot of difference between the candidates or even the parties from year to year.

obama-open-images002

In fact, if you check out the Democratic party campaigns eight years in a row, they’re pretty much exactly the same. I don’t know if these are all the same guy or what, but he sure did have a good run. And by the way, all these images come from the fascinating site 4President.org

obama-open-images003

I don’t know if it was the drugs or what but in 72 we start to see some real innovation. Jackson has some funky typography, Mills gets kinda groovy. Hartke even uses this lovely heart-key visual mnemonic device. There’s Hughes, who I believe was sponsored by Aquafresh. MUSKIE! in eye-catching purple and orange. And Ashbrook, who I call the Zoolander president because he can’t turn left.

obama-open-images004

But whatever creative momentum we had going in the 70s, by 1980 we were back to boooo-ring. Unimaginative serif type and no fun graphics whatsoever. Carter-Mondale were so bored they introduced the color green just to spice things up.

obama-open-images005

We didn’t see the next wave of innovation until 1996, a year that was notable for me because it was the first election I voted in. But it was also the first election where the candidates had websites. Which is obvious from this screengrab of Bob Dole’s splash page proclaiming the “official world wide web internet site.”

obama-open-images006

You can see the addition of the “Dole Interactive” department, where you can play Dole trivia and download posters that you can print out on your black and white inkjet printer line…by line…by line.

obama-open-images007

Over on the other side, we have Clinton-Gore’s web logo, slightly better but still kinda disappointing when you consider it was the campaign of the inventor of the internet.

obama-open-images008

I love this site because it includes that red rotary “3am emergency phone” that Hillary later used in her ads, as well as a modem. So I guess you no longer have to call at 3am when you have an emergency, you can just send an email…as long as the modem is plugged in.

obama-open-images009

That same year brought us the stunning gradients of Alan Keyes and the horrifically amateur site from a man who was not only one of the richest men in America, he was also the editor-in-chief of a major and well-designed business magazine. And of course, the unfortunately named Dick Lugar, Everything a President Should Be.

obama-open-images010

I loved Lamar Alexander’s graphics that same year. The Tennesee senator had a nice folksy “Come on along” tagline, the first-name recognition Lamar! and a beautiful lumberjack-looking pattern on the website. I think this guy ran for president about 20 times.

obama-open-images011

The next election year, it only got worse for the web. The punny www.georgew. McCain’s first interactive appearance with that lovely illustrated mouse. Lamar Alexander went slick and high-tech with a new signature. And Steve Forbes finally scraped together enough money to hire a graphic designer. What do you think a “full-scale internet campaign” consists of?

obama-open-images012

But in the 2004 election, everything changed again. After 9/11, the candidates really needed to show their patriotism. And how do you do that? Flags. Rippling, stars-and-stripes-forever flags. I’m a little concerned about the flag in John Edwards’ logo, which looks like it’s flying upside-down and backwards. Even Al Sharpton had a flag. He’s out there fighting for Fundamental Human Rights, but he still looks so pissed off.

obama-open-images013

So if 2004 was the year of the flag, 2008 was the year of the star. I compiled this helpful way of tracking the Star Power of the candidates’ identities. Fred Thompson, being a TV star, easily tops the star chart.

obama-open-images014

So as you can see, the Obama design teams lead by Sol Sender and Scott Thomas really did change the face of advertising for presidential campaigns.

IMG_0106.jpg

And maybe even the face of advertising itself?

Based on a presentation I gave before moderating the event Designing Obama on February 19, 2009 in San Francisco. Thanks to Sappi Fine Paper, xpedx and the Academy of Art for hosting this incredible and historic event.

Compostmodern Live!

Saturday, February 21st, 2009

Compostmodern

I totally should have posted this earlier today, but I was too busy plundering the Ferry Building to put together non-food thoughts. All day tomorrow I’ll be liveblogging Compostmodern on Core77 which means you can play along at home with your usual drinking game. Take a sip of beer every time I type the word “sustainable.”

Lots to report about the Designing Obama event on Thursday night, too, which was probably the most fun event I’ve ever been a part of. But I’m sleepy and my fingers need to rest up for tomorow. See you then!

Update: Here’s my wrap-up and all the liveblogged sessions in one convenient post.

On Today’s DnA: David Rockwell does the Oscars, George Lucas does architecture

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

rocktheoscars

No, this is not the stage for Frank Gehry’s 80’s birthday party, even though the milestone for the man born Ephraim Owen Goldberg is celebrated with well-wishes from friends and collaborators on today’s DnA. No, friends, this is the quite glamorous set that will greet viewers this Sunday on the Academy Awards. The return to the classy-sparkly-loungey look is thanks to David Rockwell of the Rockwell Group. I suspect it will look better than usual this year, not just because he’s same rockstar who designs thing like the new Jet Blue Terminal at JFK or the new Aloft hotel concept by Starwood (which I just wrote about in a hotel roundup for the Architect’s Newspaper and looks puuuurdy nifty), but because the Rockwell Group—famed set designers on Broadway—actually designed the Kodak Theater itself. Frances talks to Rockwell about this year’s show, the mantra for which is “more intimacy and less lamé.” Let’s hope less lamé also means less lame.

I’ll be on a plane flying back from San Francisco when the actual awards are broadcast but no matter:  Star statistician Nate Silver has already predicted the Oscar winners, including Mickey Rourke for Best Actor (yay!) and an almost complete shut-out for The Curious Case of Forrest Gump (double yay!).

Now speaking of movies, you may have heard of this guy George Lucas, who you may know holds a very special place in my family (a sort of honorary godfather, I suppose). Frances got to speak with him about USC’s new School of Cinematic Arts complex he funded (Lucas attended USC back in the day, and there’s even a famous and very funny student film set at USC called George Lucas in Love). Lucas also oversaw the design of the new building, doing all the early sketches, and it turns out he actually has designed a bunch of the Lucasfilm facilities. But no Death Star modernism for him: He loves Victorians.

The USC center isn’t fully operational, but luckily, we got this exclusive video of inside the new building as some of the students were breaking the place in:

You know, I can never watch that clip without thinking about poor Ponda Baba and how his architecture career was cut short.

Be sure to check out the DnA calendar this month, freshly restocked with delicious items. If you know of any design or architecture events in Los Angeles, please send them my way. You can listen to DnA on KCRW live every 3rd Tuesday at 2:30pm PST, by podcasting through iTunes, or by streaming the audio at any time by clicking the little ‘Listen’ button underneath each show’s title on KCRW’s website.

Licks of love

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Gelatobaby patches

I’m especially psyched for this especially long weekend and, my, what a weekend it will be: Friday the 13th, Valentine’s Day and President’s Day all in a row! In all my haste to bake a cake of Abraham Lincoln in a heart-patterned hockey mask, I’d almost forgotten to celebrate another very important milestone: The one year anniversary of this blog.

Yes, it was just over a year ago I said my hellos and welcomes and challenged everyone to make the most of Leap Day (which I ended up spending in Helsinki—wow, has it really been a year?). We’ve been to Denver and Seattle and made a surprise trip to Glasgow, Scotland together. You’ve even spent a long, sweaty summer in New York by my side.

Triple scoop patch

So I’d love to give each and every one of you out there the very first Gelatobaby product, the Gelatobaby Patch.

But seeing as I am a remedial seamstress at best, I think I’d be sewing myself right out of a writing career.

So, the first five readers who drop a comment (or send an email) telling me which of your favorite flavors of gelato you’d like to permanently affix to your clothing will get a custom cone, hand and machine-stitched to a canvas backing, complete with fusing for easy iron-on. Each Gelatobaby Patch is made from at least one piece of fabric snipped from clothing I’ve outgrown from eating too much gelato.

Just post a comment saying which two or three flavors of gelato you’d like me to scoop onto your cone. (Or maybe two flavors and a certain topping? I like a challenge.) Don’t post your address, I’ll contact you via email for that, and I’ll even throw in a Scoop so you can enjoy your Gelatobaby Patch* in fully-branded style.

Thanks to all of you for sticking with me throughout the year. That’s why I want Gelatobaby to stick with you…perhaps on your favorite cardigan.

Have a great long weekend.

*WARNING: Application of the Gelatobaby Patch will not reduce gelato cravings.

I have been diagnosed

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

Walker

I’ve always known there was something special about me. But it only got worse when I moved to Los Angeles. Here, people are kind enough to constantly remind me that my bizarre behavior—severe ambulatory addiction, itinerancy, usage of shoes— is a sure sign that something’s not quite right. But until I brought it up in conversation the other night, I never knew exactly what it was that I have, or the fact that scientists have been doing research on people like me for years. Turns out I’ve got an acute case of nominative determinism:

A term created and popularized in the magazine New Scientist. It refers to amusing instances where people’s names suggest key attributes of their jobs, professions, or lives, with the implication that their names have influenced their lives. Technically “Mr. Bunn the baker” is nominative determinism, but real examples are more highly prized, the more obscure the better.

Apparently after New Scientist published a piece about this in 1994 they were bombarded with examples like: “Pole Positions: The Polar Regions and the Future of the Planet, by Daniel Snowman…and an article on incontinence in the British Journal of Urology by J. W. Splatt and D. Weedon.”

But why? I wondered. And more importantly, why me? Here’s some explanation from an article also in New Scientist:

On the assumption that “people prefer things that are connected to the self (for example, the letters in one’s name)”, authors Brett Pelham, Matthew Mirenberg and John Jones found people are “disproportionately likely to live in places whose names resemble their own first or last names (for example, people named Louis are disproportionately likely to live in St. Louis)… [and to] choose careers whose labels resemble their names (for example, people named Dennis or Denise are over-represented among dentists).” The authors conclude that “Implicit egotism appears to influence major life decisions” and state, perhaps rather gloomily, that “This idea stands in sharp contrast to many models of rational choice…”

Was my decision to ditch my a car influenced by the perceived desire to be true to myself? Did I want to write a book about walking tours because I was so in love with the sound of my own name? Do I choose to walk over driving because my name is my…destiny?

Are there an inordinate number of Walkers out there who champion an increasingly pedestrian lifestyle? (Not that I’m saying your life is boring.)

Now just today, thanks to a friend who felt the need to pass along this wisdom from a wifi network located at 35,000 feet, I hear of yet another affliction I most definitely have come down with intermittently over the last few years, especially since I’ve been freelance. In fact, last weekend I had a rather bad case of the busman’s holiday:

Free time spent in much the same pursuit as one’s work. For example, Weather permitting, the lifeguard spent all her days off at the beach–a real busman’s holiday. The term alludes to a bus driver spending his day off taking a long bus ride.

Not only have I had a severe flare up of busman’s holiday while suffering from chronic nominative determinism, I’m pretty sure it happened while I was walking to the bus.